Détail de l'éditeur
|
|
Documents disponibles chez cet éditeur
Affiner la recherche
Titre : Aid we can : invest more in global development Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : AidWatch, Auteur Editeur : CONCORD Année de publication : 2012 Importance : 71 p. Note générale : 06.01.AID Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Aide au développement Tags : Aide au développement Politique de développement Europe UE Rapport Index. décimale : 06.01 Développement - Généralités Résumé : Ce rapport se penche sur la politique européenne en matière de coopération au développement et d'aide humanitaire. Il étudie quelle part de l'aide européenne arrive concrètement dans les pays du Sud et surveille si les engagements pris par les gouvernements européens en matière de lutte contre la pauvreté dans le monde sont respectés. En 2011, l'aide de l'UE avait baissé pour la première fois depuis 2007. Les prévisions montrent que l'UE n'atteindra pas son engagement au 0.7% du PIB d'ici 2015.
Since 2005 the development NGOs from all 27 EU countries have come together through the AidWatch initiative to produce this report, under the umbrella of CONCORD. CONCORD is the European NGO confederation for Relief and Development. Its 26 national associations, 18 international networks and 1 associate member represent 1,800 NGOs which are supported by millions of citizens across Europe. CONCORD leads reflection and political actions and regularly engages in dialogue with the European institutions and other civil society organisations. At global level, CONCORD is actively involved in the Open Forum for CSO Development effectiveness, the Beyond 2015 campaign, BetterAid and the International Forum of NGO platforms.En ligne : http://aidwatch.concordeurope.org/static/files/assets/3f200cc4/report.pdf Aid we can : invest more in global development [texte imprimé] / AidWatch, Auteur . - [S.l.] : CONCORD, 2012 . - 71 p.
06.01.AID
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Aide au développement Tags : Aide au développement Politique de développement Europe UE Rapport Index. décimale : 06.01 Développement - Généralités Résumé : Ce rapport se penche sur la politique européenne en matière de coopération au développement et d'aide humanitaire. Il étudie quelle part de l'aide européenne arrive concrètement dans les pays du Sud et surveille si les engagements pris par les gouvernements européens en matière de lutte contre la pauvreté dans le monde sont respectés. En 2011, l'aide de l'UE avait baissé pour la première fois depuis 2007. Les prévisions montrent que l'UE n'atteindra pas son engagement au 0.7% du PIB d'ici 2015.
Since 2005 the development NGOs from all 27 EU countries have come together through the AidWatch initiative to produce this report, under the umbrella of CONCORD. CONCORD is the European NGO confederation for Relief and Development. Its 26 national associations, 18 international networks and 1 associate member represent 1,800 NGOs which are supported by millions of citizens across Europe. CONCORD leads reflection and political actions and regularly engages in dialogue with the European institutions and other civil society organisations. At global level, CONCORD is actively involved in the Open Forum for CSO Development effectiveness, the Beyond 2015 campaign, BetterAid and the International Forum of NGO platforms.En ligne : http://aidwatch.concordeurope.org/static/files/assets/3f200cc4/report.pdf Aidwatch 2015
Titre : Aidwatch 2015 : Looking to the future, don't forget the past. Aid beyond 2015 Type de document : document électronique Editeur : CONCORD Année de publication : 2015 Importance : 56 p Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Aide Publique au Développement UE Aide humanitaire Coopération au développement En ligne : http://library.concordeurope.org/record/1567?ln=en Aidwatch 2015 : Looking to the future, don't forget the past. Aid beyond 2015 [document électronique] . - [S.l.] : CONCORD, 2015 . - 56 p.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Tags : Aide Publique au Développement UE Aide humanitaire Coopération au développement En ligne : http://library.concordeurope.org/record/1567?ln=en Documents numériques
DEEEP-REPORT-2015-080.pdfAdobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : AidWatch 2016 : This is not enough Type de document : document électronique Editeur : CONCORD Année de publication : 2016 Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Aide publique au développement Europe UE Résumé : The AidWatch report 2016 discloses that the European Union has again failed to meet its commitment to spend 0.7% of Gross National Income on Development Aid by 2015. The publication entitled ‘This is not enough’, reveals that only five countries met their 2015 targets. To get the full insights and figures, read the new report! En ligne : http://library.concordeurope.org/record/1834?ln=en AidWatch 2016 : This is not enough [document électronique] . - [S.l.] : CONCORD, 2016.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Tags : Aide publique au développement Europe UE Résumé : The AidWatch report 2016 discloses that the European Union has again failed to meet its commitment to spend 0.7% of Gross National Income on Development Aid by 2015. The publication entitled ‘This is not enough’, reveals that only five countries met their 2015 targets. To get the full insights and figures, read the new report! En ligne : http://library.concordeurope.org/record/1834?ln=en Documents numériques
DEEEP-REPORT-2016-081.pdfAdobe Acrobat PDF
Titre : Aidwatch report 2014 : Europe's role in financing and implementing sustainable development goals post 2015 Type de document : document électronique Editeur : CONCORD Année de publication : 2014 Importance : 60 p Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Aide Publique au Développement OMD UE Résumé : Europe's role in financing and implementing sustainable development goals post 2015 En ligne : http://library.deeep.org/record/1540/files/DEEEP-REPORT-2015-080.pdf Aidwatch report 2014 : Europe's role in financing and implementing sustainable development goals post 2015 [document électronique] . - [S.l.] : CONCORD, 2014 . - 60 p.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Tags : Aide Publique au Développement OMD UE Résumé : Europe's role in financing and implementing sustainable development goals post 2015 En ligne : http://library.deeep.org/record/1540/files/DEEEP-REPORT-2015-080.pdf Documents numériques
DEEEP-REPORT-2015-080.pdfAdobe Acrobat PDFMaking sense of EU development cooperation effectiveness
Titre : Making sense of EU development cooperation effectiveness : AidWatch 2012 Type de document : texte imprimé Editeur : CONCORD Année de publication : Nov 2012 Importance : 48 p Note générale : 06.01.AID Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Europe
Aide au développementTags : Aide au développement Europe UE Politique de développement Transparence Index. décimale : 06.01 Développement - Généralités Résumé : CONCORD AidWatch Special Report on the post-Busan development effectiveness agenda assesses the process of the Busan Partnership Agreement and the quality of EU aid.
The report identifies three key flaws of EU development cooperation: the EU aid architecture remains fragmented and poorly coordinated, the share of aid that is an actual and sustainable North-South financial transfer is limited due to formal and informal aid tying, too little aid focuses on poverty eradication because aid allocation remains distorted by non-developmental objectives.
Aid Effectiveness targets missed: The report assesses to what extent EU donors have implemented the aid effectiveness commitments made in the Paris Declaration (2005) and the Accra Agenda for Action (2008). It finds that provider countries as a whole met only one in 13 targets that were due in 2010. Progress was very uneven across EU providers, with some making more progress than others: Denmark scored best and met 7 targets, while Belgium and Luxemburg met only one target each. It finds also that recipient countries made more progress and effort in implementation than providers, and that donors progress has slowed down, in some areas has even been reversed, since 2007.
Mixed blessing at Busan: Busan lead to mixed results concerning the main aims of addressing the unfinished business of the aid effectiveness agenda, and responding to the new development landscape in which new providers from the south and the private sector play an increasingly important role. Busan failed in particular to agree on effective implementation and accountability mechanisms. The EU governments have demonstrated much less effort to push for a strong, binding and far-reaching agreement in Busan than at previous HLFs in Paris and Accra, and played a particular harmful role in opposing a strong monitoring and accountability framework for actual implementation.
Transparency and Joint Programming: The report also deals in detailed thematic chapters with two selected issues of the wide aid and development effectiveness agenda: aid transparency and joint programming. These are the issues currently prioritized by EU governments and the European Commission. While there was some progress on aid transparency and the EU has passed a ‘Transparency Guarantee’, the EU member states are still lagging behind the non-EU donors. Slightly more than 70% of EU member states have ’poor’ or ‘very poor’ aid transparency.
Uneven but overall unsatisfactory post-Busan action: EU providers’ efforts to implement Busan commitments are once again uneven across EU countries, but overall limited and unsatisfactory. One year after Busan, the necessary and effective institutions to drive implementation are still not in place.En ligne : http://www.cosv.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/AW_Special_Report_20122.pdf Making sense of EU development cooperation effectiveness : AidWatch 2012 [texte imprimé] . - [S.l.] : CONCORD, Nov 2012 . - 48 p.
06.01.AID
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Europe
Aide au développementTags : Aide au développement Europe UE Politique de développement Transparence Index. décimale : 06.01 Développement - Généralités Résumé : CONCORD AidWatch Special Report on the post-Busan development effectiveness agenda assesses the process of the Busan Partnership Agreement and the quality of EU aid.
The report identifies three key flaws of EU development cooperation: the EU aid architecture remains fragmented and poorly coordinated, the share of aid that is an actual and sustainable North-South financial transfer is limited due to formal and informal aid tying, too little aid focuses on poverty eradication because aid allocation remains distorted by non-developmental objectives.
Aid Effectiveness targets missed: The report assesses to what extent EU donors have implemented the aid effectiveness commitments made in the Paris Declaration (2005) and the Accra Agenda for Action (2008). It finds that provider countries as a whole met only one in 13 targets that were due in 2010. Progress was very uneven across EU providers, with some making more progress than others: Denmark scored best and met 7 targets, while Belgium and Luxemburg met only one target each. It finds also that recipient countries made more progress and effort in implementation than providers, and that donors progress has slowed down, in some areas has even been reversed, since 2007.
Mixed blessing at Busan: Busan lead to mixed results concerning the main aims of addressing the unfinished business of the aid effectiveness agenda, and responding to the new development landscape in which new providers from the south and the private sector play an increasingly important role. Busan failed in particular to agree on effective implementation and accountability mechanisms. The EU governments have demonstrated much less effort to push for a strong, binding and far-reaching agreement in Busan than at previous HLFs in Paris and Accra, and played a particular harmful role in opposing a strong monitoring and accountability framework for actual implementation.
Transparency and Joint Programming: The report also deals in detailed thematic chapters with two selected issues of the wide aid and development effectiveness agenda: aid transparency and joint programming. These are the issues currently prioritized by EU governments and the European Commission. While there was some progress on aid transparency and the EU has passed a ‘Transparency Guarantee’, the EU member states are still lagging behind the non-EU donors. Slightly more than 70% of EU member states have ’poor’ or ‘very poor’ aid transparency.
Uneven but overall unsatisfactory post-Busan action: EU providers’ efforts to implement Busan commitments are once again uneven across EU countries, but overall limited and unsatisfactory. One year after Busan, the necessary and effective institutions to drive implementation are still not in place.En ligne : http://www.cosv.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/AW_Special_Report_20122.pdf
Permalink
Permalink
