Catégories
Affiner la recherche
Titre : Autogestion : hier, aujourd'hui, demain Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lucien Collonges, Auteur Editeur : Paris [France] : Editions Syllepse Année de publication : 2010 Collection : Utopie critique Importance : 700 p Note générale : 04.03.COL Langues : Français (fre) Catégories : Gestion et management
AlternativesTags : Autogestion Index. décimale : 04.03 Gestion Résumé : «On produit, on vend, on se paie», ce mot d'ordre des ouvrier-es de l'usine Lip en autogestion, les auteurs de ce livre le font leur.
À l'heure où la gauche est en crise d'alternative, tant l'élaboration de perspectives d'émancipation que dans le présent résistant, l'autogestion apparaît comme l'ouverture d'un autre possible. Qui refuse et la caricature du socialisme de caserne d'État et le capitalisme de la marchandise et de l'aliénation. L'autogestion est une fenêtre sur l'avenir. S'inscrivant dans la longue tradition historique des coopératives et de la Commune de Paris, l'autogestion surgit comme une réponse immédiate et pratique à la faillite de directions d'entreprise, voire plus largement à celle de l'État lorsque celui-ci abandonne les citoyens.
Car l'autogestion ne touche pas seulement le secteur de la production?; elle touche à de nombreux autres domaines de la vie sociale: éducation, habitats, par exemple, et aux institutions politiques. Elle est autant sociétale qu'économique. Phénomène mondial, elle se développe en Europe notamment en France, en Espagne et en Italie, mais également en Amérique du Sud (Argentine, Chili, Brésil, Venezuela) et dans bien d'autres pays à travers le monde du Nord au Sud. Elle marque les grands événements révolutionnaires de la Commune de Paris à Mai 68 en passant par le mouvement de Solidarnosc en Pologne, le Chili d'Allende.
Elle est la plus actuelle des utopies de notre monde d'aujourd'hui.
Mais c'est une utopie concrète! Ce livre, qui vient après La France des années années 68 (Syllepse, 2008) se veut une anthologie sur l'autogestion. Expériences d'hier et d'aujourd'hui, d'ici et d'ailleurs, et projets pour l'avenir sont examinés.Autogestion : hier, aujourd'hui, demain [texte imprimé] / Lucien Collonges, Auteur . - Paris (69, rue des Rigoles, 75020, France) : Editions Syllepse, 2010 . - 700 p. - (Utopie critique) .
04.03.COL
Langues : Français (fre)
Catégories : Gestion et management
AlternativesTags : Autogestion Index. décimale : 04.03 Gestion Résumé : «On produit, on vend, on se paie», ce mot d'ordre des ouvrier-es de l'usine Lip en autogestion, les auteurs de ce livre le font leur.
À l'heure où la gauche est en crise d'alternative, tant l'élaboration de perspectives d'émancipation que dans le présent résistant, l'autogestion apparaît comme l'ouverture d'un autre possible. Qui refuse et la caricature du socialisme de caserne d'État et le capitalisme de la marchandise et de l'aliénation. L'autogestion est une fenêtre sur l'avenir. S'inscrivant dans la longue tradition historique des coopératives et de la Commune de Paris, l'autogestion surgit comme une réponse immédiate et pratique à la faillite de directions d'entreprise, voire plus largement à celle de l'État lorsque celui-ci abandonne les citoyens.
Car l'autogestion ne touche pas seulement le secteur de la production?; elle touche à de nombreux autres domaines de la vie sociale: éducation, habitats, par exemple, et aux institutions politiques. Elle est autant sociétale qu'économique. Phénomène mondial, elle se développe en Europe notamment en France, en Espagne et en Italie, mais également en Amérique du Sud (Argentine, Chili, Brésil, Venezuela) et dans bien d'autres pays à travers le monde du Nord au Sud. Elle marque les grands événements révolutionnaires de la Commune de Paris à Mai 68 en passant par le mouvement de Solidarnosc en Pologne, le Chili d'Allende.
Elle est la plus actuelle des utopies de notre monde d'aujourd'hui.
Mais c'est une utopie concrète! Ce livre, qui vient après La France des années années 68 (Syllepse, 2008) se veut une anthologie sur l'autogestion. Expériences d'hier et d'aujourd'hui, d'ici et d'ailleurs, et projets pour l'avenir sont examinés.
Titre : Collectief overleg in (onder)aannemingsverhoudingen : (prospectieve) analyse van concepten, procedures en structuren in rechtsvergelijkend en Europeesrechtelijk perspectief Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jan Buelens, Auteur Editeur : Brugge : die Keure Année de publication : 2012 Importance : 459 p Note générale : 04.03.BUE Langues : Néerlandais (dut) Catégories : Gestion et management Tags : Sous-traitance Index. décimale : 04.03 Gestion Résumé : (Onder)aannemingsverhoudingen hebben hun plaats veroverd in het economisch bestel. De laatste jaren wordt echter vastgesteld dat het ontbreken van een alomvattend juridisch kader meer dan eens aanleiding geeft tot misbruiken in tal van sectoren. Zelfs indien dat niet het geval is, worden werknemers van (onder)aannemers anders behandeld dan die van de opdrachtgever, ook als ze op hetzelfde terrein werkzaam zijn. Collectief overleg in (onder)aannemingsverhoudingen : (prospectieve) analyse van concepten, procedures en structuren in rechtsvergelijkend en Europeesrechtelijk perspectief [texte imprimé] / Jan Buelens, Auteur . - Brugge : die Keure, 2012 . - 459 p.
04.03.BUE
Langues : Néerlandais (dut)
Catégories : Gestion et management Tags : Sous-traitance Index. décimale : 04.03 Gestion Résumé : (Onder)aannemingsverhoudingen hebben hun plaats veroverd in het economisch bestel. De laatste jaren wordt echter vastgesteld dat het ontbreken van een alomvattend juridisch kader meer dan eens aanleiding geeft tot misbruiken in tal van sectoren. Zelfs indien dat niet het geval is, worden werknemers van (onder)aannemers anders behandeld dan die van de opdrachtgever, ook als ze op hetzelfde terrein werkzaam zijn. Corporate complicity & legal accountability
Titre : Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol. 1: Facing the facts and charting a legal path Type de document : texte imprimé Editeur : International Commission of Jurists Année de publication : 2008 Importance : 31 p Présentation : 04.03.COR/1 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Vol.1-Corporate-legal-accountabil [...] Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol. 1: Facing the facts and charting a legal path [texte imprimé] . - Suisse : International Commission of Jurists, 2008 . - 31 p : 04.03.COR/1.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Vol.1-Corporate-legal-accountabil [...]
Titre : Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol. 2: Criminal law and international crimes Type de document : texte imprimé Editeur : International Commission of Jurists Année de publication : 2008 Importance : 71 p Présentation : 04.03.COR/2 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a78423f2.pdf Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol. 2: Criminal law and international crimes [texte imprimé] . - Suisse : International Commission of Jurists, 2008 . - 71 p : 04.03.COR/2.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a78423f2.pdf
Titre : Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol . 3: Civil remedies Type de document : texte imprimé Editeur : International Commission of Jurists Année de publication : 2008 Importance : 72 p Présentation : 04.03.COR/3 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : http://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Corporate-complicity-legal-account [...] Corporate complicity & legal accountability : Vol . 3: Civil remedies [texte imprimé] . - Suisse : International Commission of Jurists, 2008 . - 72 p : 04.03.COR/3.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Droits de l'homme
Gestion et managementTags : Entreprises Droits de l'homme RSE Index. décimale : 04.03 - Gestion Résumé : While there are situations in which businesses and their offi¬cials are directly and immediately responsible for human rights abuses, allegations are frequently made that businesses have become implicated with another actor in the perpetration of human rights abuses. In such circumstances, human rights organisations and activists, international policy makers, government experts, and businesses themselves, now use the phrase “business complicity in human rights abuses” to describe what they view as undesirable business involvement in such abuses. This development has spawned reports, analysis, debate and questions. What does it mean for a business to be “complicit”? What are the consequences of such complicity? How can businesses avoid becoming complicit? How should they be held to account for their complicity? In many respects, although the use of the term is widespread, there continues to be considerable confusion and uncertainty about the boundaries of this concept and in particular when legal liability, both civil and criminal, could arise. In 2006, in order to address some of these questions the International Commission of Jurists asked eight expert jurists to form the Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes. e Panel was asked to explore when companies and their o¬fficials could be held legally responsible under criminal and/or civil law when they are complicit in g ross human rights abuses and to provide guidance as to the kind of situations prudent companies should avoid. En ligne : http://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Corporate-complicity-legal-account [...]
PermalinkPermalink
Permalink
PermalinkPermalinkEtude comparative sur les informations en matière de “gouvernance d’entreprise” publiées par les entreprises cotées dans la “Charte de gouvernance d’entreprise"
PermalinkPermalinkPermalink
Permalink
Permalink
